Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 147-153 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X8600500302

Why the Rational Paradigm Persists — The Resistance of Professional Education and Practice to Alternative Forms of Planning

Linda C. Dalton

California Polytechnic State University

For thirty years planners and critics of planning alike have confronted inadequacies in the traditional model of comprehensive rational planning. Despite this intellectual acknowledgement of the need for a different paradigm, the underlying characteristics of rationality still pervade planning education and practice. This paper argues that the more insidious features derive from the broader institutional context and deeper historical roots of the field. Consequently, practitioners cannot incorporate alternative forms of knowledge in planning unless they both become conscious of how they have accepted classic rational assumptions and are willing to adopt a new concept of planning. The essay briefly reviews several promising approaches to planning that cope with the implications of the rational paradigm and/or substitute other models. However, academics cannot expect practicing planners to adopt alternative approaches unless they demonstrate them effectively. To do so, they need to develop new teaching approaches in planning schools and to alter their own behavior so as to encourage new roles rather than simply reinforcing existing ones.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Willson
Planning Theory in Our Own Backyard: Communicative Action in Academic Governance
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2003; 22(3): 297 - 307.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
C. Hostovsky
Integrating Planning Theory and Waste Management--an Annotated Bibliography
Journal of Planning Literature, November 1, 2000; 15(2): 305 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
E. R. Alexander
Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a Post-Postmodernist Perspective
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2000; 19(3): 242 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
H. S. Baum
Teaching Practice
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 1997; 17(1): 21 - 29.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
E. M. Rocha
A Ladder of Empowerment
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 1997; 17(1): 31 - 44.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. M. Thomas
Educating Planners: Unified Diversity for Social Action
Journal of Planning Education and Research, April 1, 1996; 15(3): 171 - 182.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
H. S. Baum
Why the Rational Paradigm Persists: Tales from the Field
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1996; 15(2): 127 - 135.



Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
Diversity Issues in a Professional Curriculum: Four Stories and Some Suggestions for Change
Journal of Planning Education and Research, October 1, 1995; 15(1): 58 - 63.



Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
T. L. Harper and S. M. Stein
Out of the Postmodern Abyss: Preserving the Rationale for Liberal Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, July 1, 1995; 14(4): 233 - 244.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
H. S. Baum
A Further Case for Practitioner Faculty
Journal of Planning Education and Research, April 1, 1995; 14(3): 214 - 216.



Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
R. W. Lake
Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems
Progress in Human Geography, September 1, 1993; 17(3): 404 - 413.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
N. Calavita and K. Grimes
The Establishment of the San Diego Housing Trust Fund: Lessons for Theory and Practice
Journal of Planning Education and Research, April 1, 1992; 11(3): 170 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
C. J. Hoch
The Paradox of Power in Planning Practice
Journal of Planning Education and Research, April 1, 1992; 11(3): 206 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
P. Knox
Planning and applied geography
Progress in Human Geography, September 1, 1987; 11(4): 541 - 548.
[PDF]