Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Susskind, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ozawa, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 5-15 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X8400400103

Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector: The Planner as Mediator

Lawrence Susskind

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Connie Ozawa

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Resource allocation decisions in the public sector are typically made by legislative and administrative bodies. All too often, these methods of decision making fail to produce wise and efficient responses to conflicting needs and interests and courts are asked to review or to overturn these decisions Recent experiments with medi ated negotiation — face-to-face negotiation involving teams representing key stake- holding interests and an impartial mediator — indicate that it might be possi ble to supplement traditional resource allo cation processes in a manner likely to yield an informed consensus Three cases have been selected to illustrate the procedures and opportunities involved


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
D. F. Shmueli, S. Kaufman, and C. Ozawa
Mining Negotiation Theory for Planning Insights
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 359 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Lauria and J. A. Wagner
What Can We Learn from Empirical Studies of Planning Theory? A Comparative Case Analysis of Extant Literature
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 364 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
M. C. Campbell
Intractability in Environmental Disputes: Exploring a Complex Construct
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 2003; 17(3): 360 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Basu
Active and Dormant Neighborhoods: A Look at the Geographical Response to School-Based Care
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2002; 21(3): 274 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Harrill
Political Ecology and Planning Theory
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 1999; 19(1): 67 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
C. P. Ozawa and E. P. Seltzer
Taking Our Bearings: Mapping a Relationship Among Planning Practice, Theory, and Education
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 1999; 18(3): 257 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
S. Kaufman and J. L. Smith
Implementing Change in Locally Unwanted Land Use: The Case of GSX
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 1997; 16(3): 188 - 200.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Fischler
Planning Theory as Culture and Experience
Journal of Planning Education and Research, April 1, 1995; 14(3): 173 - 178.



Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. E. Klosterman
Planning Theory Education in the 1980s: Results of a Second Course Survey
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1992; 11(2): 130 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
J. D. Kartez
Planning for Cooperation in Environmental Dilemmas
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 1991; 5(3): 226 - 237.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
B. Sanyal
Poor Countries' Students in Rich Countries' Universities: Possibilities of Planning Education for the Twenty-first Century
Journal of Planning Education and Research, July 1, 1989; 8(3): 139 - 155.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
C. Hoch and A. Cibulskis
Planning Threatened: A Preliminary Report of Planners and Political Conflict
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1987; 6(2): 99 - 107.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
J. P. Johnson
Negotiating Environmental and Development Disputes
Journal of Planning Literature, October 1, 1986; 1(4): 509 - 521.



Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
L. C. Dalton
Why the Rational Paradigm Persists -- The Resistance of Professional Education and Practice to Alternative Forms of Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, April 1, 1986; 5(3): 147 - 153.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
G.-C. Lim
Toward a Synthesis of Contemporary Planning Theories
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1986; 5(2): 75 - 85.
[Abstract]