|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places
Patsy Healey
director of the Centre for Research in European Urban Environments in the School of Architecture, Planning and Larndscape at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne; Patsy.Healey{at}nc1.ac.uk
This article reviews the developments in the new institutionalism in social science and their relation to communicative planning theory, with emphasis on the relevance to the practcal task of responding to demands for a more place-conscious evolution in public policy. I trace the evolution of forms of governance that are more responsive to the multiple claims and social worlds of civil society and include discussion of the social-constructionist conception of institutions, the significance of actors and networks, the interrelation between structure and agency, and the cultural dimesions of social networks. The implications for developing governance capability or instittional capacity are also explored. In reviewing comnmunicative planning theory, I discuss how Habermas's approach to communicative ation may be reworked or positioned in an institutionalist perspective. Finally, I explore how these developments can be used to dvelop understanding and strategies for evoling more inclusionary approaches to intgrated, place-focused public policy.
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 19, No. 2,
111-121 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9901900201
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
K. Umemoto and H. Igarashi
Deliberative Planning in a Multicultural Milieu
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
September 1, 2009;
29(1):
39 - 53.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Olsson
Relational Rewards and Communicative Planning: Understanding Actor Motivation
Planning Theory,
August 1, 2009;
8(3):
263 - 281.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Webster
Are Some Planning Transactions Intrinsically Sovereign?
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
June 1, 2009;
28(4):
476 - 490.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Irazabal
Realizing Planning's Emancipatory Promise: Learning From Regime Theory To Strengthen Communicative Action
Planning Theory,
May 1, 2009;
8(2):
115 - 139.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Miraftab
Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South
Planning Theory,
February 1, 2009;
8(1):
32 - 50.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Agger and K. Lofgren
Democratic Assessment of Collaborative Planning Processes
Planning Theory,
July 1, 2008;
7(2):
145 - 164.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Van Herzele and C. M. J. van Woerkum
Local Knowledge in Visually Mediated Practice
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
June 1, 2008;
27(4):
444 - 455.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Chettiparamb
Re-Conceptualizing Public Participation in Planning: A View Through Autopoiesis
Planning Theory,
November 1, 2007;
6(3):
263 - 281.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Blair, J. Berry, and S. McGreal
Regional Spatial Policy for Economic Growth: Lessons from the Deployment of Collaborative Planning in Northern Ireland
Urban Stud,
March 1, 2007;
44(3):
439 - 455.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sager
The Logic of Critical Communicative Planning: Transaction Cost Alteration
Planning Theory,
November 1, 2006;
5(3):
223 - 254.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Umemoto and K. Suryanata
Technology, Culture, and Environmental Uncertainty: Considering Social Contracts in Adaptive Management
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
March 1, 2006;
25(3):
264 - 274.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hillier
Straddling the Post-Structuralist Abyss: Between Transcendence and Immanence?
Planning Theory,
November 1, 2005;
4(3):
271 - 299.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Healey
On the Project of 'Institutional Transformation' in the Planning Field: Commentary on the Contributions
Planning Theory,
November 1, 2005;
4(3):
301 - 310.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gerometta, H. Haussermann, and G. Longo
Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an Inclusive City
Urban Stud,
October 1, 2005;
42(11):
2007 - 2021.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Hillier
Book Review: Readings in planning theory
Progress in Human Geography,
April 1, 2004;
28(2):
265 - 267.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. March and N. Low
Knowing and Steering: Mediatization, Planning and Democracy in Victoria, Australia
Planning Theory,
March 1, 2004;
3(1):
41 - 69.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hillier and M. Gunder
Planning Fantasies? An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning
Planning Theory,
November 1, 2003;
2(3):
225 - 248.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Corburn
Bringing Local Knowledge into Environmental Decision Making: Improving Urban Planning for Communities at Risk
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
June 1, 2003;
22(4):
420 - 433.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Willson
Planning Theory in Our Own Backyard: Communicative Action in Academic Governance
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
March 1, 2003;
22(3):
297 - 307.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Watson
Do We Learn from Planning Practice?: The Contribution of the Practice Movement to Planning Theory
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
December 1, 2002;
22(2):
178 - 187.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sager
Deliberative Planning and Decision Making: An Impossibility Result
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
June 1, 2002;
21(4):
367 - 378.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Umemoto
Walking in Another's Shoes: Epistemological Challenges in Participatory Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
September 1, 2001;
21(1):
17 - 31.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. fauria
The Limits to Communicative Planning Theory: A Brief Introduction
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
June 1, 2000;
19(4):
331 - 332.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
