This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Edwards, M. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Public Finance in Planning Education and Practice

Department of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Planners have significant influence on the fiscal landscape of communities through the day-to-day decisions they make and the plans they implement. To better understand how our educational system addresses fiscal issues in the training of planners, the author surveyed planning instructors from across the United States and Canada and analyzed a series of public finance course syllabi. This article presents the results of this analysis and contrasts the planning instructor survey results with the results of a national survey focused on practicing planners. In this second survey, planners were asked to provide their perspectives on the importance of public finance to effective planning. Taken together, the survey results provide an interesting picture of the significance of public finance to planning academics and practitioners. This research is intended to assist planning programs in evaluating their curricula for attention to public finance and the needs of the planning profession.

Key Words: public finance • pedagogy • planning practice

References

• Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. 2006. Guide to undergraduate and graduate education in urban and regional planning. 12th ed. Retrieved from http://www.acsp.org/Guide/ACSP_Guide_2006_pdf
• Bowman, A. O'M., and M.A. Pagano. 2004. Terra incognita. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
• Burchell, R.W., and D. Listokin. 1993. Fiscal impact procedures state of the art: The subset of questions of nonresidential and open space costs. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
• Edwards, M. 2001. Fiscal impact analysis: Does method matter? Journal of the Community Development Society 32 (1).
• Huddleston, J.R. 2005. Faculty profile. Land Lines: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. July.
• Thomas, J.V. 2006. Dividing lines and bottom lines: The forces shaping local development patterns. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 275—93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 217-227 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X07305796


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Edwards, M. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?