Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lively Streets

Determining Environmental Characteristics to Support Social Behavior

Vikas Mehta

School of Architecture and Community Design at the University of South Florida

Increasingly, scholars suggest thinking of the street as a social space, rather than just a channel for movement. Studies that address the relationships between social behavior and environmental quality of the street tend to separate the study of physical features from land uses and hence do not address the interrelationships between behavioral patterns and physical features of the street and its sociability. This article is an empirical examination of behavioral responses of people to the environmental quality of neighborhood commercial streets. Structured and semistructured observations are used to study stationary, lingering, and social activities on three neighborhood commercial streets. Eleven land use and physical characteristics of buildings and the street are identified based on the literature review and extensive observations. These are measured and tested to understand which characteristics support stationary, lingering, and social activities. The findings reveal that people are equally concerned with the social, land use, and physical aspects of the street. Seating provided by businesses, seating provided by the public authorities, businesses that are community places, personalized street fronts, and sidewalk width particularly contribute to stationary and social activities on neighborhood commercial streets.

Key Words: environment behavior and perceptions • streets as social space • design of neighborhood commercial streets

References

  • Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King, and S. Angel. 1977. A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Appleyard, D. 1981. Livable streets. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
  • Arens, E., and P. Bosselmann. 1989. Wind, sun and temperature— predicting the thermal comfort of people in outdoor spaces. Building and Environment 24:315—20.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bacon, E. 1967. Design of cities. New York: Viking.
  • Banerjee, T. 2001. The future of public space—Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association 67:9—24.[Web of Science]
  • Banerjee, T., and A. Loukaitou-Sederis. 1992. Private production of downtown public open spaces: Experiences of Los Angeles and San Francisco. Los Angeles: Univ. of Southern California, School of Urban and Regional Planning.
  • Bentley, I., A. Alcock, P. Murrian, S. McGlynn, and G. Smith. 1985. Responsive environments: A manual for designers. London: Architectural Press.
  • Boarnet, M.G., and R. Crane. 2001. Travel by design: The influence of urban form on travel. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Bosselmann, P., J. Flores, W. Gray, T. Priestley, R. Anderson, E. Arens, P. Dowty, S. So, and J. Kim. 1984. Sun, wind and comfort: A study of open spaces and sidewalks in four downtown areas. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, College of Environmental Design, Univ. of California.
  • Brower, S. 1988. Design in familiar places: What makes home environments look good. New York: Praeger.
  • ———. 1996. Good neighborhoods. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Calthorpe, P. 1993. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Carmona, M., T. Heath, T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell. 2003. Public places—Urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
  • Carr, S., M. Francis, L.G. Rivlin, and A.M. Stone. 1992. Public space. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Cattell, R. 1966. The meaning and the strategic use of factor analysis. In Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology, ed. R. Cattell, 174—243. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Celik, Z., D. Favro, and R. Ingersoll, eds. 1995. Streets: Critical perspectives on public space. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
  • Cervero, R. 1996. Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Research A 30:361—77.
  • Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research D 2:199—219.[CrossRef]
  • Chekki, D., ed. 1994. The community of the streets. Greenwich, CT: Jai.
  • Christoforidis, A. 1994. New alternatives to the suburbs: Neo-traditional developments. Journal of Planning Literature 8:429—40.[Free Full Text]
  • Ciolek, M.T. 1978. Spatial behavior in pedestrian areas. Ekistics 45:120—2.
  • Cohen, H., S. Moss, and E. Zube. 1979. Pedestrians and the wind in the urban environment. In Environmental design: Research, theory and application, ed. A. Seidel and S. Danford, 71—82. Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association.
  • Coley, R., F. Kuo, and W. Sullivan. 1997. Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior 29:468—92.[Abstract]
  • Cooper-Marcus, C. 1975. Easter Hill Village: Some social implications of design. New York: Free Press.
  • Cooper-Marcus, C., and M. Francis. 1998. People places: Design guidelines for urban open space. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
  • Coupland, A., ed. 1997. Reclaiming the city: Mixed use development. London: Spon.
  • Crane, R. 2000. The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretative review. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15:3—23.[CrossRef]
  • Crowhurst-Lennard, S., and H. Lennard. 1987. Livable cities— People and places: Social and design principles for the future of the city. New York: Center for Urban Well-being.
  • ———. 1995. Livable cities observed. Carmel, CA: Gondolier.
  • Cullen, G.N. 1961. The concise townscape. New York: Reinhold.
  • Dane, S. 1997. Main Street success stories. Washington, DC: National Main Street Center, National Trust for Historic Preservation.
  • De Jonge, D. 1967—1968. Applied hodology. Landscape 17:10—11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dornbush, D., and P. Gelb. 1977. High-rise impact on the use of parks and plazas. In Human response to tall buildings, ed. D. Conway, 112—30. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
  • Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point.
  • Eubank-Ahrens, B. 1991. A closer look at the users of Woonerven. In Public streets for public use, ed. A. Vernez-Moudon, 63—79. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
  • Ewing, R. 1996. Best development practices. Chicago, IL: Planners.
  • Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2001. Travel and the built environment. Transportation Research Record 1780:87—114.[CrossRef]
  • Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
  • Francis, M. 1988. Negotiating between children and adult design values in Open Space Project. Design Study 9:67—75.[CrossRef]
  • Frank, L., and P.O. Engelke. 2001. The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. Journal of Planning Literature 16:202—18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Frank, L., P.O. Engelke, and T.L. Schmid. 2003. Health and community design: The impact of the built environment on physical activity. Washington, DC: Island.
  • Fyfe, N., ed. 1998. Images of the street. London: Routledge.
  • Gehl, J. 1987. Life between buildings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • ———. 1989. A changing street life in a changing society. Places 6:9—17.
  • Gehl, J., and L. Gemzoe. 1996. Public spaces, public life. Copenhagen: Arkitektens.
  • ———. 2000. New city spaces. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
  • Gibson, J.J. 1979. An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Girouard, M. 1985. Cities and people: A social and architectural history. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
  • Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360—80.[CrossRef]
  • Greenbaum, S. 1982. Bridging ties at the neighborhood level. Social Networks 4:367—84.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Greenwald, M.J., and M.G. Boarnet. 2000. Built environment as a determinant of walking behavior: Analyzing non work pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record 1780:33—42.[CrossRef]
  • Grey, A., et al. 1970. People and downtown. Seattle: College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Univ. of Washington.
  • Handy, S., M. Boarnet, R. Ewing, and R. Killingsworth. 2002. How the built environment affects physical activity—Views from planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 25:64—73.
  • Hass-Klau, C., G. Crampton, C. Dowland, and I. Nold. 1999. Streets as living space: Helping public spaces play their proper role. London: ETP/Landor.
  • Heft, H. 1989. Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 19:1—30.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hester, R. 1984. Planning neighborhood space with people. 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • ———. 1993. Sacred structures of everyday life: A return to Manteo, North Carolina. In Dwelling, seeing and designing: Toward a phenomenological ecology, ed. D. Seamon, 217—98. New York: State Univ. of New York Press.
  • Jacobs, A. 1993. Great streets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Joardar, S. 1977. Emotional and behavioral responses of people to urban plazas: A case study of downtown Vancouver. PhD diss., Univ. of British Columbia.
  • Joardar, S., and J. Neill. 1978. The subtle differences in configuration of small public spaces. Landscape Architecture 68:487—91.
  • Johnston, C. 2005. What is heritage? http://www.teachingheritage.nsw.edu.au/1views/w1v_johnston.html
  • Kasturi, T., X. Sun, and C.G. Wilmot. 1998. Household travel, household characteristics, and land use: An empirical study from the 1994 Portland activity-based travel survey. Transportation Research Record 1617:10—17.[CrossRef]
  • Kitamura, R., L. Laidet, and P. Mokhtarian. 1997. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24:125—58.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Knowles, P., and D. Smith. 1982. The ecological perspective applied to social perception: Revision of a working paper. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 12:53—78.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Krier, L. 1992. Leon Krier: Architecture and urban design, 1967—1992. New York: St. Martin's.
  • Krier, R. 1979. Urban space. New York: Rizzoli.
  • Kunstler, J.H. 1994. The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America's man-made landscape. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Langdon, P. 1997. A better place to live: Reshaping the American suburb. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Press.
  • Liebermann, E. 1984. People's needs and preferences as the basis of San Francisco's downtown open space plan. Paper presented at the 8th conference of the International Association for the Study of People and Their Physical Surroundings, Berlin.
  • Linday, N. 1978. It all comes down to a comfortable place to sit and watch. Landscape Architecture 68:492—7.
  • Llewelyn-Davies. 2000. Urban design compendium. London: English Partnerships/ Housing Corporation.
  • Lofland, L. 1998. The public realm: Exploring the city's quintessential social territory. New York: De Gruyter.
  • Loukaitou-Sederis, A., and T. Banerjee. 1993. The negotiated plaza: Design and development of corporate open space in downtown Los Angeles and San Francisco. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13:1—12.[Abstract]
  • ———. 1998. Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
  • Lynch, K. 1984. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Messenger, T., and R. Ewing. 1996. Transit-oriented development in the Sunbelt. Transportation Research Record 1552:145—52.[CrossRef]
  • Miles, D., R. Cook, and R. Cameron. 1978. Plazas for people. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
  • Montgomery, J. 1998. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3:93—116.[CrossRef]
  • Moore, R. 1991. Streets as playgrounds. In Public streets for public use, ed. A. Vernez-Moudon, 45—62. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
  • Oldenburg, R. 1981. The great good place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
  • Preiser, W. 1971. The use of ethological methods in environmental analysis: A case study. Edmond, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
  • Project for Public Spaces. 2000. How to turn a place around: A handbook for creating successful public spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
  • Pushkarev, B., and J. Zupan. 1975. Urban space for pedestrians. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rapoport, A. 1990. History and precedent in environmental design. New York: Plenum.
  • Rybczynski, W. 1993. The new downtowns. Atlantic Monthly 271:98—106.
  • Saelens, B.E., J.F. Sallis, and L.D. Frank. 2003. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 25:80—91.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Share, L. 1978. A. P. Giannini Plaza and Transamerica Park: Effects of their physical characteristics on users' perception and experiences. In New directions in environmental design research, ed. W. Rogers and W. Ittelson, 127—39. Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association.
  • Sitte, C. 1945. City planning according to artistic principles, trans. C. T. Stewart. New York: Reinhold.
  • Skjæveland, O. 2001. Effects of street parks on social interactions among neighbors: A place perspective. Journal of Architectural Planning Research 18:131—47.
  • Smith, R. 1975. Measuring neighborhood cohesion: A review of some suggestions. Human Ecology 3:139—60.
  • Sorkin, M., ed. 1992. Variations on a theme park. New York: Noonday.
  • Southworth, M., and E. Ben-Joseph. 1996. Streets and the shaping of towns and cities. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Stokols, D. 1995. The paradox of environmental psychology. American Psychologist 50:821—37.[CrossRef]
  • Sullivan, W., F. Kuo, and S. DePooter. 2004. The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and Behavior 36:678—700.[Abstract]
  • Tibbalds, F. 1992. Making people friendly towns: Improving the public environment in towns and cities. Harlow, UK: Longman.
  • Vernez-Moudon, A., ed. 1991. Public streets for public use. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
  • Vernez-Moudon, A., P.M. Hess, M.C. Snyder, and K. Stanilov. 1997. Effects of site design and pedestrian travel in mixed-use, medium density environments. Transportation Research Record 1578:48—55.[CrossRef]
  • Walzer, M. 1986. Pleasures and cost of urbanity. Dissent 33: 470—84.[Web of Science]
  • Whyte, W.H. 1980. The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
  • ———. 1988. City: Rediscovering the center. New York: Doubleday.
  • Zacharias, J., T. Stathopoulos, and H. Wu. 2001. Microclimate and downtown open space activity. Environment and Behavior 33:296—315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Zucker, P. 1959. Town and square: From the agora to the village green. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
  • Zukin, S. 1996. The culture of cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 165-187 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X07307947


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?