Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaber, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Simulating Planning

SimCity as a Pedagogical Tool

John Gaber

Auburn University

Teaching with the computer simulation game "SimCity" is one way faculty can achieve some of their decision-based learning objectives. The research on attainable (and not attainable) teaching outcomes with computer simulations is now fairly clear. SimCity provides a dynamic decision-making environment in which students can learn such teaching objectives as (1) systems thinking, (2) problem-solving skills, and (3) "craft" in the planning profession. However, SimCity has inherent weaknesses that prevent it from being a one-size-fits-all teaching tool for all students. The article concludes with a discussion on which type of students do better with SimCity.

Key Words: planning pedagogy • SimCity

References

  • Adams, Audrey. 2004. Pedagogical underpinnings of computer-based learning. Journal of Advance Nursing 46 (1): 5—12.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Adams, Paul. 1998. Teaching and learning with SimCity 2000. Journal of Geography 97:47—55.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Boud, David. 1995. Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.
  • Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
  • Fishman, Robert. 1982. Urban utopias in the twentieth century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier. Boston, MA: MIT.
  • Friedmann, John. 1987. Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Garris, Rosemary, Robert Ahlers, and James Driskell. 2002. Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming 33 (4): 441—67.[CrossRef]
  • Gokhale, Anu. 1996. Effectiveness of computer simulation for enhancing higher order thinking. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 33 (4): 36—46.
  • Hoch, Charles. 1994. What planners do: Power, politics, and persuasion. Chicago: American Planning Association.
  • Hung, David. 2002. Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning and instruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13 (Winter, i4): 393—415.
  • Jacobs, Allan. 1980. Making city planning work. Chicago: American Planning Association.
  • Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
  • Kelly, Eric Damian, and Barbara Becker. 2000. Community planning: An introduction to the comprehensive plan. Washington, DC: Island.
  • Klabbers, Jan. 2006. The magic circle: Principles of gaming and simulations. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Kramer, Greg. 2003. SimCity 4 deluxe edition: Prima's official strategy guide. Roseville, CA: Prima Games.
  • Kolson, Kenneth. 2001. Plans: The allure and folly of urban design. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Levy, John. 2003. Contemporary urban planning. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Lobo, Daniel. 2005. A city is not a toy: How SimCity plays with urbanism. Presented at the Discussion Paper Series, Cities Program, Architecture and Engineering, Creative Commons. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Manocchia, Michael. 1999. SimCity 2000 software. Teaching Sociology 27 (2): 212—15.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Maxis. 1989. SimCity: The city simulator. User documentation. Walnut Creek, CA.
  • ———. 2003. SimCity 4. Reference manual. San Mateo, CA: EA Games.
  • McKinney, William. 1997. The educational use of computer based science simulations: Some lessons from the philosophy of science. Science and Education 6:591—603.[CrossRef]
  • Miller, Donald. 1986. The Lewis Mumford reader. New York: Pantheon.
  • Nantais, Kristin, and Glenn Schellenberg. 1999. The Mozart effect: An artifact or preference. American Psychological Society 10 (4): 370—73.
  • Nathan, Mitchell, and Cecil Robinson. 2001. Considerations of learning and learning research: Revisiting the "media effects" debate. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 12 (1): 69—88.
  • Pas, Eric. 1995. The urban transportation planning process. In 2nd ed. of The geography of urban transportation, ed. Susan Hanson, 53—80. New York: Guilford.
  • Plainsman, Auburn. 2003. Professor uses SimCity in urban-planning class. Auburn University student newspaper June 12, A5.
  • Rauscher, Frances, Gordon Shaw, and Katherine Ky. 1993. Music and spatial task performance. Nature 365:611.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rothfeder, Jeffrey. 2004. Terror games. Popular Science (March): 83—91, 115.
  • Schon, Donald. 1973. Beyond the stable state. New York: Norton.
  • Simon, Herbert. 1985. The sciences of the artificial. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Starr, Paul. 1994. Seductions of Sim: Policy as simulation game. The American Prospect 5 (March): 17.
  • Swaak, J., and T. de Jong. 2001. Discovery simulations and the assessment of intuitive knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17:284—94.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Tompkins, Patricia. 1998. Role playing/simulation. The Internet TESL Journal IV (8).
  • Wilson, Johnny. 1990. The SimCity planning commission handbook. Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Zacharia, Zacharias, and O. Roger Anderson. 2003. The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students' conceptual understanding of physics. American Association of Physics Teachers 71 (6): 618—29.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 113-121 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X07305791


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. B. Hollander and D. Thomas
Commentary: Virtual Planning: Second Life and the Online Studio
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2009; 29(1): 108 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaber, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?