Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yoon Soo Jung
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Influences of Context and Process on Project Planning Success

John M. Bryson

Philip Bromiley

Yoon Soo Jung

This study reports results of a quan titative analysis of fifty-eight cases of deliberate efforts to produce ma jor change, or "projects." The results demonstrate that (1) the greater the potential impact on resource alloca tion patterns, (2) the greater the ex tent of problem identification efforts, and (3) the more extensive the use of problem solving as a conflict reso lution strategy, the more likely it is that project goals will be achieved and that the organization with prime responsibility for the project will be satisfied. The study provides an em pirical defense for the utility of planning and planners, and guidance on ways to improve planning prac tice.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, 183-195 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9000900304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
L. D. Hopkins
Planning as Science: Engaging Disagreement
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 399 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
H. Briassoulis
How the Others Plan: Exploring the Shape and Forms of Informal Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 1997; 17(2): 105 - 117.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
E. Talen
After the Plans: Methods to Evaluate the Implementation Success of Plans
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 1996; 16(2): 79 - 91.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
E. Talen
Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 1996; 10(3): 248 - 259.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Fischler
Planning Theory as Culture and Experience
Journal of Planning Education and Research, April 1, 1995; 14(3): 173 - 178.



Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
R. V. George
Formulating the Right Planning Problem
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 1994; 8(3): 240 - 259.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. G. Mahayni, B. Moore-Milroy, and N. Toulan
1992 Chester Rapkin Award for the Best Article in Volume 11 Award Committee Statement
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1993; 12(2): 166 - 167.



Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
P. Bromiley
Response Dear Editor
Journal of Planning Education and Research, July 1, 1991; 10(3): 177 - 179.