|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 9, No. 3,
155-163 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9000900301
The Neglect of Urban Design in the American Academic Succession
Alan Kreditor
The dramatic growth of American urban areas since the 1940s, which has come in ever-larger increments especially at the urban fringe, has helped architecture and planning to flourish but has failed to produce an urban design profession of compara ble size or repute. The answer may lie in the ways in which architecture and planning have chosen to recon cile their internal forces with the de mands of societal change. But to un derstand those choices we may need to look at professional education in these fields and how they have made their place in the academy.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Thomas
Educating Planners: Unified Diversity for Social Action
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
April 1, 1996;
15(3):
171 - 182.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. A. Feldman
Perloff Revisited: Reassessing Planning Education in Postmodern Times
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
January 1, 1994;
13(2):
89 - 103.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Dagenhart and D. Sawicki
If (Urban) Design is Everything, Maybe It's Nothing
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
January 1, 1994;
13(2):
146 - 148.
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Dagenhart and D. Sawicki
Architecture and Planning: The Divergence of Two Fields
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
October 1, 1992;
12(1):
1 - 16.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Alterman
A Transatlantic View of Planning Education and Professional Practice
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
October 1, 1992;
12(1):
39 - 54.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|