Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lauria, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 16-24 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X8400400104

The Implications of Marxian Rent Theory For Community-Controlled Redevelopment Strategies

Mickey Lauria

The University of Iowa

Community-controlled implementation organizations are necessary to initiate the process of urban redevelopment in deterio rated low-income urban neighborhoods The Classical Economic Urban Redevelop ment Model includes a set of parallel development actors who compete to affect and control this redevelopment process A major component of this competition is the extraction and subsequent utilization of rent The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical basis for this com ponent of the competition and to use it to suggest strategies for community- controlled redevelopment The theoretical model suggests that community-controlled organizations should focus their opposi tion on absentee landlords and private developers rather than on realtors and financial institutions It also suggests that the avenue for opposition should entail community ownership and control through land trusts, development corporations, and neighborhood improvement associations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
K. F. Gotham
(Re)Branding the Big Easy: Tourism Rebuilding in Post-Katrina New Orleans
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2007; 42(6): 823 - 850.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
K. F. Gotham
Tourism Gentrification: The Case of New Orleans' Vieux Carre (French Quarter)
Urban Stud, June 1, 2005; 42(7): 1099 - 1121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
E. G. Goetz and M. S. Sidney
Local Policy Subsystems and Issue Definition: An Analysis of Community Development Policy Change
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 1997; 32(4): 490 - 512.
[Abstract]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
T. Barnes
Theories of Agricultural Rent within the Surplus Approach
International Regional Science Review, November 1, 1984; 9(2): 125 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]