This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hou, J. Articles by Kinoshita, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bridging Community Differences through Informal Processes

Reexamining Participatory Planning in Seattle and Matsudo

Department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Washington, Seattle

Isami Kinoshita

Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Science at Chiba University, Japan

Participatory planning today faces a dual challenge—the growing diversity and differences at the community level and the limitations of institutionalized participation. By comparing two cases of community planning in Seattle, Washington, and Matsudo, Japan, this article examines the role of informal processes in overcoming institutional and social barriers and negotiating differences of identities, values, and interests. The article argues that, through animated interactions, building of trust, experiential learning, and spontaneity, informal activities and processes can serve as important vehicles for creating meanings, social relationships, and collective actions and enable planners to navigate the cultural and political terrain of community differences.

Key Words: participatory planning • community; diversity • differences • informal processes

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 301-314 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X06297858


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. Brabham Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects Planning Theory, August 1, 2009; 8(3): 242 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. C. Dandekar Commentary: A Multiuniversity Planning Studio at the World Planning Congress: An Opportunity for International Planning Education Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2009; 28(3): 382 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Carp "Ground-Truthing" Representations of Social Space: Using Lefebvre's Conceptual Triad Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2008; 28(2): 129 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]