Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, J.
Right arrow Articles by Torng, G.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 317-330 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X04267714

A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives

Evidence from Boston and Atlanta

Jonathan Levine

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan

Aseem Inam

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan

Gwo-Wei Torng

Mitretek Systems, Inc.

The usefulness of land use and transportation approaches including new urbanism, smart growth, transit villages, and jobs-housing balance is frequently assessed based on the capacity of these innovations to reduce auto use. This study, in contrast, argues that regulatory barriers to these approaches underpin their relative scarcity and that removal of these barriers demands no justification in proof of travel-behavior modification. Rather, such reform can improve the fit between people’s transportation-land use preferences and actual neighborhood choices. This fit is compared here between two distinct U.S. metropolitan areas: Boston and Atlanta. In providing a greater range of neighborhood types, Boston allowed a closer fit between household transportation-land use preference and actual neighborhood choice than did Atlanta. This suggests the potential gains in household choice from removal of barriers to alternative development forms.

Key Words: sprawl • smart growth • travel behavior


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
Jiawen Yang
Policy Implications of Excess Commuting: Examining the Impacts of Changes in US Metropolitan Spatial Structure
Urban Stud, February 1, 2008; 45(2): 391 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Zhang
Travel Choice with No Alternative: Can Land Use Reduce Automobile Dependence?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2006; 25(3): 311 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]