This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stiftel, B. Articles by Alam, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Faculty Quality at U.S. Graduate Planning Schools

A National Research Council-Style Study

Florida State University

Deden Rukmana

Florida State University

Bhuiyan Alam

Florida State University

Faculty quality assessment methods of the National Research Council study of research doctorate programs are applied to U.S. urban and regional planning graduate programs. Findings suggest that about one-half of planning faculty actively publish and that there is considerable concentration of both publication and citation activity among a relatively small group of scholars and schools. Accredited and nonaccredited schools show substantial differences, as do doctoral degree-granting schools compared with master’s-only schools. The strengths and weaknesses of faculty quality measures used are discussed, leading to a call for other studies using different measures.

Key Words: urban planning education • university performance measurement • faculty quality

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 6-22 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X04267998


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Stiftel, A. Forsyth, L. Dalton, and F. Steiner Assessing Planning School Performance: Multiple Paths, Multiple Measures Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2009; 28(3): 323 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. K. Maghelal Commentary: Assessing Student-Authored Articles in "Urban Planning" Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2008; 28(1): 108 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Frank Measuring Public Service: Assessment and Accountability--To Ourselves and Others Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2008; 27(4): 499 - 506. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. A. Goldstein and J. Carmin Compact, Diffuse, or Would-be Discipline?: Assessing Cohesion in Planning Scholarship, 1963-2002 Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2006; 26(1): 66 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Hambleton Purpose and Collegiality in Planning Education: An International Perspective Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2006; 26(1): 107 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Stiftel, D. Rukmana, and B. Alam A Reply to Graduate Planning School Study Responses Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2004; 24(2): 128 - 130. [PDF]

				M. B. Teitz, A. Forsyth, D. Myers, and L. Albrechts Responses to the Graduate Planning School Study Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2004; 24(1): 23 - 27. [PDF]