Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corburn, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bringing Local Knowledge into Environmental Decision Making

Improving Urban Planning for Communities at Risk

Jason Corburn

This article reveals how local knowledge can improve planning for communities facing the most serious environmental and health risks. These communities often draw on their firsthand experience—here called local knowledge—to challenge expert-lay distinctions. Community participation in environmental decisions is putting pressure on planners to find new ways of fusing the expertise of scientists with insights from the local knowledge of communities. Using interviews, primary texts, and ethnographic fieldwork, this article defines local knowledge, reveals how it differs from professional knowledge, and argues that local knowledge can improve planning in at least four ways (1) epistemology, adding to the knowledge base of environmental policy; (2) procedural democracy, including new and previously silenced voices; (3) effectiveness, providing low-cost policy solutions; and (4) distributive justice, highlighting inequitable distributions of environmental burdens.

Key Words: local knowledge • environmental health • community planning

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, 420-433 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X03022004008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Planning TheoryHome page
D. C. Brabham
Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects
Planning Theory, August 1, 2009; 8(3): 242 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Planning TheoryHome page
J. Anderson
Talk To the Hand? Community Councils and Planning Consultation
Planning Theory, November 1, 2008; 7(3): 284 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
A. Van Herzele and C. M. J. van Woerkum
Local Knowledge in Visually Mediated Practice
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2008; 27(4): 444 - 455.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
N. D. Botchwey
The Religious Sector's Presence in Local Community Development
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2007; 27(1): 36 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
W. Evans
Bibliography
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2003; 12(4): 445 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]