Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamal, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond Labels

Pragmatic Planning in Multistakeholder Tourism-Environmental Conflicts

Tazim B. Jamal

Stanley M. Stein

Thomas L. Harper

This article advocates a neopragmatic approach to collaborative planning in protected areas characterized by historical conflict among diverse stakeholders. Our example is a multisectoral process initiated to address use and development conflicts in the international tourism destination of Banff National Park, Canada. We show how philosophical presuppositions (essentialism and metaphysical realism) can impede collaboration and exacerbate problems when categories like environmentalist and terms like ecological integrity are used. Rather than fixing categories and terms up front, a more fluid planning approach is advocated; terms are flexible and meanings emerge through dialogue. Shared descriptions replace contentious categories and terms.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, 164-177 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X02238445


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
C. J. Hoch
Pragmatic Communicative Action Theory
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2007; 26(3): 272 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Lauria and J. A. Wagner
What Can We Learn from Empirical Studies of Planning Theory? A Comparative Case Analysis of Extant Literature
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 364 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
R. Harrill
Residents' Attitudes toward Tourism Development: a Literature Review with Implications for Tourism Planning
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 2004; 18(3): 251 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
S. M. Stein and T. L. Harper
Power, Trust, and Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2003; 23(2): 125 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]