This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Saarikoski, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Naturalized Epistemology and Dilemmas of Planning Practice

University of Helsinki, Department of Economics and Management

This article proposes that a feminist interpretation of naturalized epistemology provides a sound basis for a deliberative planning approach. It preserves the grounds for making reasoned choices between competing validity claims while promoting a view of planning as a diverse and deliberative enterprise attentive to various ways of knowing and modes of expression. The solution is based on a revised notion of objectivity that emphasizes the important function of biases—values, experiences, and contextual commitments—in "truth tracking."

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 3-14 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0202200101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Umemoto and H. Igarashi Deliberative Planning in a Multicultural Milieu Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2009; 29(1): 39 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Carp Wit, Style, and Substance: How Planners Shape Public Participation Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2004; 23(3): 242 - 254. [Abstract] [PDF]