|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Collaborative Planning
Building Consensus and Building a Distinct Model for Practice
Richard D. Margerum
Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management at the University of Oregon
Collaborative planning is an interactive process of consensus building and implementation using stakeholder and public involvement. Based on research of twenty case studies in the United States and Australia, the author explores some of the most common obstacles that have confronted stakeholder groups in their effort to build consensus, including contextual, compositional, operational, organizational, ideological, and power and capacity. The case studies reveal a range of responses for overcoming these obstacles and highlight some important distinctions between models of collaborative planning and conflict resolution. The researcher also identifies key questions for stake-holders to use in designing and assessing consensus-building processes.
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 21, No. 3,
237-253 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0202100302

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Deyle and C. Schively Slotterback
Group Learning in Participatory Planning Processes: An Exploratory Quasiexperimental Analysis of Local Mitigation Planning in Florida
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
September 1, 2009;
29(1):
23 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Irazabal
Realizing Planning's Emancipatory Promise: Learning From Regime Theory To Strengthen Communicative Action
Planning Theory,
May 1, 2009;
8(2):
115 - 139.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Laurian and M. M. Shaw
Evaluation of Public Participation: The Practices of Certified Planners
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
March 1, 2009;
28(3):
293 - 309.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Ansell and A. Gash
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory.,
October 1, 2008;
18(4):
543 - 571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Schively
A Quantitative Analysis of Consensus Building in Local Environmental Review
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
September 1, 2007;
27(1):
82 - 98.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Laurian
Deliberative Planning through Citizen Advisory Boards: Five Case Studies from Military and Civilian Environmental Cleanups
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
June 1, 2007;
26(4):
415 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Hoch
Pragmatic Communicative Action Theory
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
March 1, 2007;
26(3):
272 - 283.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kaza
Tyranny of the Median and Costly Consent: A Reflection on the Justification for Participatory Urban Planning Processes
Planning Theory,
November 1, 2006;
5(3):
255 - 270.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Lauria and J. A. Wagner
What Can We Learn from Empirical Studies of Planning Theory? A Comparative Case Analysis of Extant Literature
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
June 1, 2006;
25(4):
364 - 381.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schlossberg
Coordination as a Strategy for Serving the Transportation Disadvantaged: A Comparative Framework of Local and State Roles
Public Works Management Policy,
October 1, 2004;
9(2):
132 - 144.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Carp
Wit, Style, and Substance: How Planners Shape Public Participation
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
March 1, 2004;
23(3):
242 - 254.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|