This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bianco, M. J. Articles by Adler, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Politics of Implementation

The Corporatist Paradigm Applied to the Implementation of Oregon’s Statewide Transportation Planning Rule

Portland State University, biancom{at}pdx.edu

Sy Adler

Portland State University, adlers{at}pdx.edu

This article examines how the public and private sector negotiate implementation of a controversial public policy, Oregon’s Transportation Planning Rule. The Rule, adopted in 1991, originally called for all localities to create plans in compliance with goals of a 20 percent decrease in vehicle miles traveled and a 10 percent decrease in parking spaces over a 30-year period, which has presented a challenge to policy actors. This article places the implementation process within the context of a modified corporatist paradigm involving three actors: a directive state, the private sector, and litigious public interest groups. The authors examine how recent amendments to the Rule illustrate tensions among these actors and conclude that three important factors account for the successes and failures in the Rule’s implementation: persistent negotiation, threat of lawsuit, and a shared commitment among all involved to "do the right thing."

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, 5-16 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0102100101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. L. Thompson Taming the Neighborhood Revolution: Planners, Power Brokers, and the Birth of Neotraditionalism in Portland, Oregon Journal of Planning History, August 1, 2007; 6(3): 214 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]