This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Birch, E. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Practitioners and the Art of Planning

Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of Pennsylvania

Over time, practitioners, both in the "field" and in academia, have revised their conceptions of the three facets (defined here as design, craft, and presentation) of the art of planning, responding to evolving societal needs and growing demands of university-based professional training. Tracing the contents of successive American Planning Association (APA) (and its predecessors’) mission statements and several versions of the "Green Book" (and its predecessors) reveals these dramatic changes and demonstrates the profession’s remarkable adaptability. In the future, as practitioners continue to elaborate the art of planning, they must maintain and strengthen their own internal links, remain focused on the profession’s underlying themes and, most important, emphasize and reward applied research drawn from in-field experience. The Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning and the APA/American Institute of City Planning have decisive roles in this effort.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, 407-422 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0102000403


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. A. Goldstein and J. Carmin Compact, Diffuse, or Would-be Discipline?: Assessing Cohesion in Planning Scholarship, 1963-2002 Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2006; 26(1): 66 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. Birch Seymour Mandelbaum as an Intellectual Colleague: Boss Tweed's New York as a Template Planning Theory, July 1, 2006; 5(2): 115 - 120. [PDF]

				K. Krizek and D. Levinson Teaching Integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning: Topics, Readings, and Strategies Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2005; 24(3): 304 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Beauregard The Multiplicities of Planning Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 437 - 439. [PDF]

				M. Howland Response to Birch, Hopkins, and Dalton Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 440 - 442. [PDF]

				M. B. Teitz Commentary on the ACSP Mini-Symposium Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 443 - 444. [PDF]

				R. A. Yabes Comments on Birch, Hopkins, and Dalton Articles Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 445 - 447. [PDF]