This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hopkins, L. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Planning as Science

Engaging Disagreement

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Planning scholarship will benefit from research conversations focused on cumulative knowledge about how planning works and how urban settlements work. Our everyday decisions present opportunities. (1) Initiate and sustain conversations through conferences. (2) Referee papers to encourage cumulative scholarship. (3) Cultivate funding sources. (4) Establish awards that recognize contributions to conversations. (5) Hire faculty with scholarly conversations in mind.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, 399-406 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0102000402


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K. Maghelal Commentary: Assessing Student-Authored Articles in "Urban Planning" Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2008; 28(1): 108 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. S. Christensen and K. Chapple Farewell Note Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2008; 27(4): 381 - 381. [PDF]

				H. A. Goldstein and J. Carmin Compact, Diffuse, or Would-be Discipline?: Assessing Cohesion in Planning Scholarship, 1963-2002 Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2006; 26(1): 66 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. P. Donaghy and L. D. Hopkins Coherentist Theories of Planning are Possible and Useful Planning Theory, July 1, 2006; 5(2): 173 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. Birch The Birth of City Planning in the United States 1840-1917 Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2005; 24(4): 453 - 455. [PDF]

				K. S. Christensen Report from the Editor Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2004; 24(1): 5 - 5. [PDF]

				A. Forsyth Trajectories of Planning Theory: The 2001 ACSP Anniversary Round Table Planning Theory, November 1, 2002; 1(3): 203 - 208. [PDF]

				R. A. Beauregard The Multiplicities of Planning Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 437 - 439. [PDF]

				M. Howland Response to Birch, Hopkins, and Dalton Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 440 - 442. [PDF]

				M. B. Teitz Commentary on the ACSP Mini-Symposium Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 443 - 444. [PDF]

				R. A. Yabes Comments on Birch, Hopkins, and Dalton Articles Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 445 - 447. [PDF]