Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pezzoli, K.
Right arrow Articles by Howe, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Planning Pedagogy and Globalization

A Content Analysis of Syllabi

Keith Pezzoli

University of California, San Diego

Deborah Howe

Portland State University

Global megatrends including economic restructuring, migration, and environmental degradation have profoundly transformed planning practice; this reality needs to be reflected in planning education. To this end, a content analysis of sixty-nine planning syllabi was conducted to identify how and to what extent global themes are being included. The analysis highlighted the interdisciplinary nature of globalized planning pedagogy and the greater emphasis on planning theory and history and economic development. The courses were clustered according to common themes, and these are discussed as they relate to planning practice. Noteworthy pedagogical approaches are highlighted.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 365-375 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0102000308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
A. K. Ali and P. L. Doan
A Survey of Undergraduate Course Syllabi and a Hybrid Course on Global Urban Topics
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2006; 26(2): 222 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
H. A. Goldstein, S. Bollens, E. Feser, and C. Silver
An Experiment in the Internationalization of Planning Education: The NEURUS Program
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 349 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
D. B. Abramson
The "Studio Abroad" as a Mode of Transcultural Engagement in Urban Planning Education: A Reflection on Ten Years of Sino-Canadian Collaboration
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2005; 25(1): 89 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Mitrany and D. Stokols
Gauging the Transdisciplinary Qualities and Outcomes of Doctoral Training Programs
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2005; 24(4): 437 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
K. Krizek and D. Levinson
Teaching Integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning: Topics, Readings, and Strategies
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2005; 24(3): 304 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]