This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wheeler, S. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Planning for Metropolitan Sustainability

Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of California, Berkeley, swheeler{at}uclink4.berkeley.edu

This article establishes a framework for thinking about sustainable development in the metropolitan context by investigating the origins of the sustainability concept and its meanings when applied to urban development, surveying historical approaches to planning the urban region, and analyzing ways in which a context can be created for regional sustainability planning. Sustainability is seen as requiring a holistic, long-term planning approach, as well as certain general policy directions such as compact urban form, reductions in automobile use, protection of ecosystems, and improved equity. Based on the experience of three sample regions, the article suggests a long-term strategic approach in which vision statements, coalition building, institutional development, intergovernmental incentive frameworks, indicators, public involvement, and social learning help create a regional context in which sustainable development is increasingly possible.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, 133-145 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0002000201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. S. Zeemering What Does Sustainability Mean to City Officials? Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2009; 45(2): 247 - 273. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Saha and R. G. Paterson Local Government Efforts to Promote the "Three Es" of Sustainable Development: Survey in Medium to Large Cities in the United States Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2008; 28(1): 21 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Baxamusa Empowering Communities through Deliberation The Model of Community Benefits Agreements Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 261 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Chifos The Sustainable Communities Experiment in the United States: Insights from Three Federal-Level Initiatives Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2007; 26(4): 435 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hirt The Compact versus the Dispersed City: History of Planning Ideas on Sofia's Urban Form Journal of Planning History, May 1, 2007; 6(2): 138 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gunder Sustainability: Planning's Saving Grace or Road to Perdition? Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2006; 26(2): 208 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. R. Jabareen Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2006; 26(1): 38 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Hirt Toward Postmodern Urbanism?: Evolution of Planning in Cleveland, Ohio Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2005; 25(1): 27 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gunder Shaping the Planner's Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian Interpretation of Planning Education Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2004; 23(3): 299 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]