Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huxley, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 369-377 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0001900406

The Limits to Communicative Planning

Margo Huxley

Department of Geography, Royal Hollolway, University of London; M.E.Hxley{at}rhbnc.ac.uk

While stuLdies undertaken by communicative planninig theorists provide valuable inisights inito everyday platnning practice, there is a growing debate arounid the need for greater acknowledgement of relationis of power atnd iniequality. In particular, communicative planning theory has tended to obscure planning's problematic relation to the state. This paper openis for debate conceptionis of public dis-course in planning that, on the one hand, draw on Habermas's notions of communiicative rationality, but on the other, fail to critically examine his positioning of these in opposition to state and economy. It is argued that the implications of critiques of Habermas's ideas nmay involve questioning the very possibility of comntLinicative planning itself.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and UrbanizationHome page
A. Pal
Scope for bottom-up planning in Kolkata: rhetoric vs reality
Environment and Urbanization, October 1, 2006; 18(2): 501 - 521.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
V. Watson
Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics
Planning Theory, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 31 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
L. Albrechts
Creativity as a Drive for Change
Planning Theory, November 1, 2005; 4(3): 247 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
K. Bickerstaff and G. Walker
Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning
Urban Stud, November 1, 2005; 42(12): 2123 - 2144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
L. Albrechts
Reconstructing Decision-Making: Planning Versus Politics
Planning Theory, November 1, 2003; 2(3): 249 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
P. Healey
Collaborative Planning in Perspective
Planning Theory, July 1, 2003; 2(2): 101 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
K. Bickerstaff and G. Walker
The place(s) of matter: matter out of place - public understandings of air pollution
Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2003; 27(1): 45 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
V. Watson
The Usefulness of Normative Planning Theories in the Context of Sub-Saharan Africa
Planning Theory, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 27 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]