This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Huxley, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Limits to Communicative Planning

Department of Geography, Royal Hollolway, University of London; M.E.Hxley{at}rhbnc.ac.uk

While stuLdies undertaken by communicative planninig theorists provide valuable inisights inito everyday platnning practice, there is a growing debate arounid the need for greater acknowledgement of relationis of power atnd iniequality. In particular, communicative planning theory has tended to obscure planning's problematic relation to the state. This paper openis for debate conceptionis of public dis-course in planning that, on the one hand, draw on Habermas's notions of communiicative rationality, but on the other, fail to critically examine his positioning of these in opposition to state and economy. It is argued that the implications of critiques of Habermas's ideas nmay involve questioning the very possibility of comntLinicative planning itself.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 369-377 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0001900406


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Umemoto and H. Igarashi Deliberative Planning in a Multicultural Milieu Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2009; 29(1): 39 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Purcell Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements? Planning Theory, May 1, 2009; 8(2): 140 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pal Scope for bottom-up planning in Kolkata: rhetoric vs reality Environment and Urbanization, October 1, 2006; 18(2): 501 - 521. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Watson Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics Planning Theory, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 31 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Albrechts Creativity as a Drive for Change Planning Theory, November 1, 2005; 4(3): 247 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Bickerstaff and G. Walker Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning Urban Stud, November 1, 2005; 42(12): 2123 - 2144. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Albrechts Reconstructing Decision-Making: Planning Versus Politics Planning Theory, November 1, 2003; 2(3): 249 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Healey Collaborative Planning in Perspective Planning Theory, July 1, 2003; 2(2): 101 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Bickerstaff and G. Walker The place(s) of matter: matter out of place - public understandings of air pollution Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2003; 27(1): 45 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Watson The Usefulness of Normative Planning Theories in the Context of Sub-Saharan Africa Planning Theory, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 27 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]