Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischler, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 233-241 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0001900302

Linking Planning Theory and History: The Case of Development Control

Raphael Fischler

School of Urban Planning at McGill University, Montreal; raphaelfjurbarc.Lan.McGill

As a source of collective identity, planning history is valuable for purposes of professional socialization. But it can also provide insights into current dilemmas of planning practice as it explains the origins of institutions and techniques and documents the concerns of planners in earlier generations. This paper highlights the relevance of historical writings, by planning pioneers and by historians, to contemporary planning theory by analyzing how planning pioneers framed public problems and professional discretion in early development regulation. A case-study on the adoption of housing laws in late 19th-century New York City illustrates the benefits that planning theorists, including those working in a communicative perspective, can derive from historical research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning HistoryHome page
R. Fischler
Teaching History to Planners
Journal of Planning History, November 1, 2006; 5(4): 280 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning HistoryHome page
S. J. Peterson
Priming the Historian in All Planners
Journal of Planning History, November 1, 2006; 5(4): 289 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Lauria and J. A. Wagner
What Can We Learn from Empirical Studies of Planning Theory? A Comparative Case Analysis of Extant Literature
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 364 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
L. Wolf-Powers
Up-Zoning New York City's Mixed-Use Neighborhoods: Property-Led Economic Development and the Anatomy of a Planning Dilemma
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2005; 24(4): 379 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
V. Watson
Do We Learn from Planning Practice?: The Contribution of the Practice Movement to Planning Theory
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2002; 22(2): 178 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Fischler
Communicative Planning Theory: A Foucauldian Assessment
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2000; 19(4): 358 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]