Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ozawa, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Seltzer, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Taking Our Bearings: Mapping a Relationship Among Planning Practice, Theory, and Education

Connie P. Ozawa

Ethan P. Seltzer

The curriculum for graduate education in planning has been largely dictated by a conception of the planner's role as a technical advisor to decisionmakers. The rational planning model has shaped the construction of the core curriculum. Recent work by planning theorists suggests that the planner does more than simply provide technical advice, but serves to facilitate communications in critical ways. This article reports the results of a survey of senior planning professionals regarding the skills and competencies they seek in entry-level planners. The results provide strong support for communicative planning theories and suggest a recasting of traditional conceptions of what constitutes core graduate planning curricula.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 257-266 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9901800307
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. W. Willson
In-Class--Online Hybrid Methods of Teaching Planning Theory: Assessing Impacts on Discussion and Learning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2008; 28(2): 237 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
L. A. Schweitzer, E. J. Howard, and I. Doran
Planners Learning and Creating Power: A Community of Practice Approach
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2008; 28(1): 50 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
E. L. Birch
Practitioners and the Art of Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 407 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]