Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond Confused Noise: Ideas Toward Communicative Procedural Justice

Jean Hillier

Department of Urhan and Reonal Planning, durtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia; hillier{at}arch.curtin.edu.au

In this article, I discuss local planning decision making as a form of public policy making undertaken by the state and involving some degree of public participation. I am interested in communlcative action as a normative basis for participatory decision making of public policy matters. Empirically, however, differences of discourses have led to participants talking past each other rather than negotiating with each other. Using a case study from Perth, Western Australia, I demonstrate the idea of procedural justice and examine the reasons for participants' dissatisfaction with public participation processes. I then develop some tentative principles for a more procedurally just communicative planning practice.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 14-24 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9801800102
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
K. Umemoto and H. Igarashi
Deliberative Planning in a Multicultural Milieu
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2009; 29(1): 39 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Lauria and J. A. Wagner
What Can We Learn from Empirical Studies of Planning Theory? A Comparative Case Analysis of Extant Literature
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 364 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
K. Umemoto
Walking in Another's Shoes: Epistemological Challenges in Participatory Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2001; 21(1): 17 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Fischler
Communicative Planning Theory: A Foucauldian Assessment
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2000; 19(4): 358 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]