Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Souza Briggs, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1-13 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9801800101

Doing Democracy Up-Close: Culture, Power, and Communication in Community Building

Xavier de Souza Briggs

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University;xavierbriggs{at}hud.gov

This article considers how democracy gets done, and undone, at the micro-level of the planning meeting. I use concepts of social performance to frame issues of culture and power that have received limited attention in earlier planning research. Drawing on three brief ethnographic accounts of a public interaction or "speech occasion," I extend Forester's call for planners and policy professionals to understand and respond to the diverse communication styles and subtle power relations that shape public life. Informed responses are critical if planners aim to learn and get results while meaningfully involving various "publics" or stakeholders in decisions. Without such competence, many efforts to deliberate to "do" democracy in a diverse society will struggle along at needlessly high levels of confusion, distrust, and even resentment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. Hou and I. Kinoshita
Bridging Community Differences through Informal Processes: Reexamining Participatory Planning in Seattle and Matsudo
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2007; 26(3): 301 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Lauria and J. A. Wagner
What Can We Learn from Empirical Studies of Planning Theory? A Comparative Case Analysis of Extant Literature
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 364 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. J. Chaskin
Democracy And Bureaucracy in a Community Planning Process
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2005; 24(4): 408 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. Shirlow and B. Murtagh
Capacity-building, Representation and Intracommunity Conflict
Urban Stud, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 57 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. Corburn
Bringing Local Knowledge into Environmental Decision Making: Improving Urban Planning for Communities at Risk
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2003; 22(4): 420 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]