Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denmark, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, 231-245 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9801700304

The Outsiders: Planning and Transport Disadvantage

David Denmark

Transport Planning and Management in Marricksville, New South Wales, Australia; denmark{at}enternet.com.au

The notion of transport disadvantage and how it is addressed by planners in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom are examined in this paper. Key groups of transport disadvantaged people are identified, which leads to a discussion of the importance of the concept of mobility and access for all members of the community. The second part of the paper suggests that the provision of transport can be used as a tool to advance equity in a population. Given that government subsidies are often associated with the promotion of equity, the effects of transportation subsidies are discussed. The third section of the paper examines some possible remedies for transport disadvantage in both an operational and policy sense. Non-mainstream transportation solutions are examined and their place in the overall system identified. The chief strength of much paratransit its close ties to local planning processes is compared with traditional transport planning approaches. Finally, a case is made for more public participation in transport planning and the development of local planning processes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Works Management PolicyHome page
M. Schlossberg
Coordination as a Strategy for Serving the Transportation Disadvantaged: A Comparative Framework of Local and State Roles
Public Works Management Policy, October 1, 2004; 9(2): 132 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
L. Schweitzer and A. Valenzuela Jr.
Environmental Injustice and Transportation: The Claims and the Evidence
Journal of Planning Literature, May 1, 2004; 18(4): 383 - 398.
[Abstract] [PDF]