Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Procedural Expertise for Efficient Multiattribute Evaluation: A Procedural Support Strategy for CEA

Insung Lee

Lewis D. Hopkins

Previously developed decision support systems for multiattribute evaluation focus on support of computation and representation, but provide no guidance for efficient use of methods for particular decision problems and environments. We examine a procedural support strategy to guide the decision maker in efficiently choosing what judgments to consider in the computation of equivalent alternatives (CEA) method. A Monte-Carlo simulation measures the efficiency and accuracy of various procedural strategies. Decision rules are identified that can structure CEA and enhance its efficiency. The implied combination of procedural expertise and substantive domain expertise will help to create more effective decision support systems.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, 255-268 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9501400403
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
L. D. Hopkins
Planning as Science: Engaging Disagreement
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2001; 20(4): 399 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
S. Guhathakurta
Urban Modeling and Contemporary Planning Theory: Is There a Common Ground?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 1999; 18(4): 281 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. E Klosterman
Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 1997; 17(1): 45 - 54.
[Abstract]