Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Education and Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnley, I. H.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Exurban Development in Australia and the United States: Through a Glass Darkly

Ian H. Burnley

Peter A. Murphy

Exurban population growth around Australian cities has been observed for at least a quarter of a century. Low-density residential development of this type has been a concern of land use planners over the same period, with loss of prime agricultural land, costs of service provision, landscape impacts, and overreliance on transport by private automobiles being the main issues. Focusing on Sydney's perimetropolitan region, this paper presents data on exurban growth rates and intraurban migration for the decade 1981 to 1991 and also sketches sociodemographic features of exurban settlers. While the types of people populating exurbia are similar to their US counterparts, rates of exurban growth are much lower. The second part of the paper suggests reasons for this contrast. Although a number of factors regarded as driving exurban growth in the US also operate in Australia, they are argued to have less impact. Other factors relevant in the US do not appear to be significant in Australia The differing spatial structure of Australian and US cities, along with the apparently greater strength of regional planning in Australia, are argued to account for the differences.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, 245-254 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9501400402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
T. Fisher
Differentiation of Growth Processes in the Peri-urban Region: An Australian Case Study
Urban Stud, March 1, 2003; 40(3): 551 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
I.H. Burnley, P.A. Murphy, and A. Jenner
Selecting Suburbia: Residential Relocation to Outer Sydney
Urban Stud, June 1, 1997; 34(7): 1109 - 1127.
[Abstract] [PDF]