Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baum, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 251-262 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9401300402

Community and Consensus: Reality and Fantasy in Planning

Howell S. Baum

Strategic planning has been presented as a way to set organizational direction. Differences between corporate enterprises and nonprofit community organizations raise questions whether strategic planning can help the latter. This article presents a case study in strategic planning by a Jewish community federation. Religious differences led to conflicts over policy and procedures. However, planning participants had political and psychological interests in seeing the community as unified. As a result, they followed consensus procedures that let them avoid examining differences, but led to decisions that the majority did not like. Strategic planning cannot escape addressing social, cultural, and psychological differences and conflicts about them.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Lauria and J. A. Wagner
What Can We Learn from Empirical Studies of Planning Theory? A Comparative Case Analysis of Extant Literature
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 364 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
M. Harris, R. Hutchison, and B. Cairns
Community-Wide Planning for Faith-Based Service Provision: Practical, Policy, and Conceptual Challenges
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 2005; 34(1): 88 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Gunder
Shaping the Planner's Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian Interpretation of Planning Education
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2004; 23(3): 299 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
J. Hillier and M. Gunder
Planning Fantasies? An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning
Planning Theory, November 1, 2003; 2(3): 225 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
K. Umemoto
Walking in Another's Shoes: Epistemological Challenges in Participatory Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2001; 21(1): 17 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
S. Sen
Reviews
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 1998; 17(4): 367 - 369.



Home page
Urban StudHome page
M. B. Teitz
American Planning in the 1990s: Evolution, Debate and Challenge
Urban Stud, May 1, 1996; 33(4-5): 649 - 671.
[PDF]