Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Audirac, I.
Right arrow Articles by Shermyen, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, 161-173 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9401300301

An Evaluation of Neotraditional Design's Social Prescription: Postmodern Placebo or Remedy for Suburban Malaise?

Ivonne Audirac

Anne H. Shermyen

Among the various American postmodern urban design schemes which offer pedestrian propinquity as design synthesis and remedy for suburban malaise, traditional neighbor hood design (TND) bears the influence of Leon Krier's architectural determinism. This paper claims that social consequences axiomatic to TND principles are problematic given previous experiences with planned communities and neighborhood research. In light of this literature and observations made at Seaside, Florida—the prototypic example of the TND movement—this paper concludes that developments which attempt to adapt TND elements to the realities of modern lifesryles and a metropolitan context will further test TND assumptions and result in compromises necessary for the evolution of the paradigm.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
Y. R. Jabareen
Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2006; 26(1): 38 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. Markovich and S. Hendler
Beyond "Soccer Moms": Feminist and New Urbanist Critical Approaches to Suburbs
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2006; 25(4): 410 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
L. C. Manzo and D. D. Perkins
Finding Common Ground: The Importance of Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning
Journal of Planning Literature, May 1, 2006; 20(4): 335 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
S. A. Hirt
Toward Postmodern Urbanism?: Evolution of Planning in Cleveland, Ohio
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2005; 25(1): 27 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
A. M. Garde
New Urbanism as Sustainable Growth?: A Supply Side Story and Its Implications for Public Policy
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2004; 24(2): 154 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. L. Nasar
Does Neotraditional Development Build Community?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2003; 23(1): 58 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
E. Talen
The Problem with Community in Planning
Journal of Planning Literature, November 1, 2000; 15(2): 171 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
I. Audirac
Stated Preference for Pedestrian Proximity: An Assessment of New Urbanist Sense of Community
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 1999; 19(1): 53 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
E. Talen
Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism
Urban Stud, July 1, 1999; 36(8): 1361 - 1379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
A. Churchman
Disentangling the Concept of Density
Journal of Planning Literature, May 1, 1999; 13(4): 389 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
M. A. Berman
The Transportation Effects of Neo-Traditional Development
Journal of Planning Literature, May 1, 1996; 10(4): 347 - 363.
[Abstract]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
M. B. Teitz
American Planning in the 1990s: Evolution, Debate and Challenge
Urban Stud, May 1, 1996; 33(4-5): 649 - 671.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
R. Crane
On Form versus Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, or Increase It?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1996; 15(2): 117 - 126.
[Abstract]