Journal of Planning Education and Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harper, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, 105-116 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9201100203

The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory

Thomas L. Harper

Planning Program, Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4

Stanley M. Stein

Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1 N4

Since planning is a normative activity one would expect public planning to be based on moral foundations. Unfortunately, post-WWII mainstream planning theory became divorced from ethical theory. Ironically, this cleavage reflected an erroneous shared premise—that each discipline was technical in nature and should eschew value questions. This fallacious premise is now largely rejected. Contemporary planning theory fully recognizes the inherently normative nature of public planning processes. However, it still makes little use of normative ethical theory to illuminate the issues raised by this recognition. In this article we will present a spectrum of five normative ethical theories and show how these theories provide the underlying normative foundation for six theories of planning. Thus many debates about planning theories can be understood as debates about underlying normative ethical theories


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
S. Ganapati
Critical Appraisal of Three Ideas for Community Development in the United States
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2008; 27(4): 382 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
F. Lo Piccolo and H. Thomas
Research Ethics in Planning: a Framework for Discussion
Planning Theory, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 7 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
R. W. Lake
Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems
Progress in Human Geography, September 1, 1993; 17(3): 404 - 413.
[PDF]